This article originally appeared in The Wall Street Journal and was re-printed by BernieSanders.com.
In Washington, Democrats are grappling with what it means to be a minority party in the age of Donald Trump. In the rest of the country, populist followers of Sen. Bernie Sanders are mounting a sustained effort to answer the question from the bottom up.
In California, supporters of the 2016 presidential contender packed the obscure party meetings that chose delegates to the state Democratic convention, with Sanders backers grabbing more than half the slots available.
They swept to power in Washington state at the Democratic state central committee, ousting a party chairman and installing one of their own in his place. Sanders acolytes have seized control of state parties in Hawaii and Nebraska and won posts throughout the party structure from coast to coast.
Those gains come from an under-the-radar blitz in a debate over the future of the party following its bruising 2016 losses. While Democrats nationwide have put the focus on President Trump, the Sanders wing of the party has engaged in an intramural fight to remake the party in a more populist, liberal mold.
“It is absolutely imperative that we see a major transformation of the Democratic Party,” Mr. Sanders said in an interview last week. The party has “to do what has to be done in this country, to bring new energy, new blood.”
The party will choose its new chairman on Saturday at a meeting in Atlanta. Some in the Democratic old guard harbor concerns that a sharp turn to the left could alienate centrist voters, jeopardize the party’s position in the next presidential election and, before then, lead to primary challenges to incumbent Democrats in the 2018 midterm elections.
“Is the Bernie Sanders-Elizabeth Warren wing of the party going to push us too far to the left?” asked former Pennsylvania Gov. Ed Rendell, who also served as chairman of the Democratic National Committee. “Only if they start going after incumbent moderate Democrats in primaries like the Tea Party did.”
Last week, a group of former Sanders campaign aides launched a super PAC with the explicit goal of mounting primary challenges to Democratic incumbents. Party leaders are urging Democrats to focus on fighting Mr. Trump and his GOP allies instead of turning their fire inward.
For now, the strategy of Mr. Sanders’s followers is to infiltrate and transform the Democratic Party’s power structure, starting with the lowest-level state and county committee posts that typically draw scant attention.
“From where I come from in the Bernie movement, people believe that there are permanent obstacles to change,” said Larry Cohen, the board chairman of Our Revolution, the political organization that grew from the 2016 Sanders presidential campaign.
The broader goal is not only to pull the party to the left on policy, but also to fundamentally alter how it operates by eschewing corporate donors, shifting resources from television advertising to neighborhood organizing and stripping power from longtime party elders—including the “superdelegates” who can tip presidential primary contests—ahead of the 2020 election.
Mr. Sanders said the mobilization efforts are a legacy of his presidential campaign. “You have meetings where, in the old days, 20 people would show up. Now hundreds of people are showing up, in terms of competing for seats on Democratic state committees,” he said. “That is the goal—to bring more people into the political process.”
The primary vehicle is Our Revolution, which with its database of five million supporters has a trove of information about the left wing of the Democratic Party. Mr. Sanders and Our Revolution have no plans to share the list with the Democratic National Committee (DNC), Mr. Cohen said.
The group taps a movement reminiscent of the Tea Party, which upturned the GOP establishment after Barack Obama’s election in 2008 sent Republicans to a historic defeat. Republican grass-roots insurgents toppled centrist GOP incumbents and forced others to adopt more conservative political positions to win their primary contests, in a running battle for control of the party that lasted years.
Our Revolution’s top goals include making party officials and elected Democrats more accountable to activists, and replacing them if they aren’t.
The tool is a crowdsourced tracking system of officer elections and schedules of local Democratic Party meetings around the country. It collects information on events from state and county meetings to legislative and congressional district gatherings, which elect members of state central committees and delegates to state party conventions. The group’s goals aren’t subtle—the web address for the database is transformtheparty.com, and the default password for new users is bernie2020.
The system was built and is operated by Jon Culver, a 30-year-old web developer who worked for the Sanders presidential campaign from Seattle. Mr. Culver can text or email members of Mr. Sanders’ supporter list within a specific jurisdiction and urge them to attend meetings and vote for Our Revolution-backed candidates.
“This is a nationwide push to try and better understand and map out how the party works,” Mr. Culver said. “Before, people were reliant on local resources being good and up-to-date.”
The highest-profile test of the clout of the Sanders faction will come when DNC members gather this week in Atlanta to choose their next party chairman. Mr. Sanders, his supporters and Our Revolution are backing Minnesota Rep. Keith Ellison. Most of the party’s establishment, loyal to Mr. Obama and 2016 presidential nominee Hillary Clinton, support former Labor Secretary Tom Perez.
Whichever candidate prevails in Atlanta, he will preside over a party that is rapidly being populated by activists partial to the Sanders brand of liberal populism. “A lot of people are concerned that if Keith [Ellison] is not elected, there could be a backlash,” said Michelle Deatrick, a former Sanders campaign staffer from Michigan who last year won a seat on the DNC.
The Ellison organizing effort risks a backlash of its own. Pennsylvania Democratic Party Chairman Marcel Groen was annoyed recently when a group tweeted to urge followers to call him to show support for Mr. Ellison. More than 300 calls came in, jamming his line.
“They are putting an awful lot of pressure on people; it’s over the top,” said Mr. Groen, who subsequently endorsed Mr. Perez. “It’s counterproductive.”
Our Revolution last month emailed California supporters, urging them to attend the state Democratic Party’s Assembly District conventions, and included an approved slate of candidates. Delegates elected will attend the California Democratic Party’s May state convention, where they elect the party’s chairman and determine its rules and platform.
In the Sacramento suburb of Elk Grove, more than 1,000 people showed up to stand in line outside a bowling alley in a torrential rainstorm to vote in the obscure party election.
Facing a slate of local establishment Democrats that included Elk Grove Mayor Steve Ly and his wife, the Our Revolution-backed team swept all 14 slots to the state convention. The feat was repeated across the state: Our Revolution’s candidates won more than 600 of 1,120 convention slots up for grabs in California in January.
Amar Shergill, an Elk Grove attorney, led the Our Revolution-backed slate. He has already begun pushing local Democrats to move to the left. When the local Democratic congressman, Ami Bera, held a town-hall meeting at Elk Grove city hall in late January, Mr. Shergill and others packed it to press him on a 2015 vote to restrict entry from Syrian refugees.
Eric Bauman, a longtime Clinton supporter and party activist from Los Angeles who is running for California state chairman, backed Mr. Ellison for DNC chairman three weeks after the state’s assembly district elections.
The chairman of the Los Angeles County Democratic Party since 2000, Mr. Bauman said his decision to back Mr. Ellison was influenced by the new wave of California activists. “The Democratic Party has to be a living and vibrant organization, and it has to re-image itself regularly,” he said.
Hawaii Democrats chose Tim Vandeveer, a Sanders delegate to last year’s convention, as party chairman last May. Jane Kleeb, an environmental activist who is a member of Our Revolution’s board of directors, became chairwoman of the Nebraska Democratic Party in December. Ms. Kleeb hasn’t been shy about chiding Democrats for not being sufficiently liberal.
“We are here in the states and in the streets,” she said. “Trump and D.C. Dems do not seem to care.”
In January, Washington state’s Democrats ousted incumbent chairman Jaxon Ravens, a longtime party official, in favor of Tina Podlodowski, a former Microsoft Corp. executive who lost a 2016 campaign for Washington secretary of state.
Ms. Podlodowski won 70% of the vote from the Washington Democratic Party’s state central committee, whose members were chosen by precinct committee officers elected last May. Overall in Washington, Sanders acolytes won a majority of state central committee posts after Our Revolution encouraged Sanders supporters there to run last year for the precinct committee officers.
Mr. Culver built a website that described the positions and spelled out how to run. “It showed a runway of success when you can give people clear instructions of how to participate,” Mr. Culver said. “We can tell them where to show up and what’s relevant to them and they will deliver.”
In Florida’s Brevard County, a GOP stronghold Mr. Trump won by 20%, a few dozen Sanders-campaign alumni were surprised in December when they swept elections for the local Democratic Party officer positions.
“We didn’t know that 60 folks would be enough to take the majority,” said Stacey Patel, who got involved in politics organizing for the Sanders presidential campaign and was elected Brevard County’s Democratic Party chairwoman.
In Iowa, Our Revolution experienced resistance. It endorsed Blair Lawton, the Sanders campaign’s political director in the state, for its Democratic Party chairman race. But he couldn’t generate enough support to win, so the Sanders group shifted its allegiance to Derek Eadon, a top aide to Mr. Obama’s 2012 Iowa campaign.
In Michigan, a central battleground during both the 2016 presidential primary and general election, Democrats were rocked by ongoing divisions between the establishment and Sanders loyalists. Before the January filing deadline to attend Michigan’s state party convention, Our Revolution urged Michiganders on its email list to register to vote in the party’s election for chairman and state central committee.
Brandon Dillon, chairman of the Michigan Democratic Party, faced criticism from Sanders-campaign alumni. He consolidated his position by accommodating the left wing of the party in its platform and by endorsing Mr. Ellison for DNC chairman. Mr. Ellison returned the favor by endorsing his re-election as party leader.
But Sanders forces still got a bigger voice in the party: Ms. Deatrick was named to the DNC. At the state party convention Feb. 11, Sanders supporters won at least seven leadership posts within the state party, with more on the state central committee.
Mr. Dillon was re-elected Michigan Democratic Party chairman by acclamation. He didn’t face opposition.
Since 2009 the democrats have lost a super majority in the Senate, the Presidency and the House. They have lost Governorship’s and State legislatures. They have lost Pennsylvania, Ohio, Florida, Michigan (and nearly Minnesota). Globally their European brethren have lost the UK and are about to lose Germany and France.
Doubling down on the Marxist agenda is a losing proposition. While rejecting the classical liberalism of JFK and MLK the democrats continue to surge left and further and further into irrelevance. What is the endgame? Becoming an obscure footnote in historical textbooks some centuries in the future?
There is an existing model to emulate: JFK. Democrats need to return to their roots and expel the radical elements that is perverting the party.
MLK was a democratic socialist, not a liberal and the Democratic Party was so Marxist… that Bernie Sanders wanted no part of it for 50 years right? 😀
I like the energy and the movement Berniecrats have started to make the Democrats more progressive from the inside out!
Eventually, however, instead of the two-party system, we need to do something about First Past the Post. It is this system that has artificially propped up the GOP, even as they are proto-fascist and turning actually fascist by the second.
I realize this kind of structural reform is difficult, but states like Maine have done it! We need at least ranked choice voting in our state ballot initiatives.
LikeLiked by 1 person
You’re right, FPTP has to go because it’s pretty undemocratic. That’s why Our Revolution backed the Maine initiative for ranked choice voting/instant run-off voting. More here: https://pplswar.wordpress.com/2016/11/09/all-of-our-revolutions-down-ballot-2016-victories/?wref=tp
why are you retweeting libs @pplswar ?
To trigger fascists and fascists sympathizers.